Learning ObjectivesBy the end of this section, you will be able to do the following:
- Evaluate the Keynesian view of recessions through an understanding of sticky wages and prices and the importance of aggregate demand
- Explain the coordination argument, menu costs, and macroeconomic externality
- Analyze the impact of the expenditure multiplier
Now that we have a clear understanding of what constitutes aggregate demand, we return to the Keynesian argument using the model of AD/AS. For a similar treatment using Keynes’ income-expenditure model, see the appendix on The Expenditure-Output Model.
Keynesian economics focuses on explaining why recessions and depressions occur, and on offering a policy prescription for minimizing their effects. The Keynesian view of recession is based on two key building blocks. First, aggregate demand is not always automatically high enough to provide firms with an incentive to hire enough workers to reach full employment. Second, the macroeconomy may adjust slowly to shifts in aggregate demand because of sticky wages and prices, which are wages and prices that do not respond to decreases or increases in demand. We consider these two claims in turn, and then see how they are represented in the AD/AS model.
The first building block of the Keynesian diagnosis is that recessions occur when the level of household and business sector demand for goods and services is less than what is produced when labor is fully employed. In other words, the intersection of aggregate supply and aggregate demand occurs at a level of output less than the level of GDP consistent with full employment. Suppose the stock market crashes, as occurred in 1929. Or, suppose the housing market collapses, as occurred in 2008. In either case, household wealth declined and consumption expenditure followed. Suppose businesses see that consumer spending is falling. This will reduces expectations of the profitability of investment, so businesses will decrease investment expenditure.
This seemed to be the case during the Great Depression, because the physical capacity of the economy to supply goods did not alter much. No flood or earthquake or other natural disaster ruined factories in 1929 or 1930. No outbreak of disease decimated the ranks of workers. No key input price, such as the price of oil, soared on world markets. The U.S. economy, in 1933, had just about the same factories, workers, and state of technology that it had had four years earlier in 1929—and yet the economy shrunk dramatically. This also seems to be what happened in 2008.
As Keynes recognized, the events of the Depression contradicted Say’s law that “supply creates its own demand.” Although production capacity existed, the markets were not able to sell their products. As a result, real GDP was less than potential GDP.
Wage and Price Stickiness
Wage and Price Stickiness
Keynes also pointed out that although AD fluctuated, prices and wages did not respond immediately, as economists often expected. Instead, prices and wages are sticky, making it difficult to restore the economy to full employment and potential GDP. Keynes emphasized one particular reason why wages are sticky: the coordination argument. This argument points out that, even if most people are willing—at least hypothetically—to see a decline in their own wages in bad economic times, as long as everyone else also experienced such a decline, a market-oriented economy has no obvious way to implement a plan of coordinated wage reductions. Unemployment proposed a number of reasons why wages might be sticky downward, most of which center on the argument that businesses avoid wage cuts because they may, in one way or another, depress morale and hurt the productivity of the existing workers.
Some modern economists have argued in a Keynesian spirit that, along with wages, other prices may be sticky, too. Many firms do not change their prices every day or even every month. When a firm considers changing prices, it must consider two sets of costs. First, changing prices uses company resources; managers must analyze the competition and market demand and decide what the new prices will be, sales materials must be updated, billing records must be changed, and product labels and price labels must be redone. Second, frequent price changes may leave customers confused or angry—especially if they find out that a product now costs more than expected. These costs of changing prices are called menu costs—like the costs of printing up a new set of menus with different prices in a restaurant. Prices do respond to forces of supply and demand, but from a macroeconomic perspective, the process of changing all prices throughout the economy takes time.
To understand the effect of sticky wages and prices in the economy, consider Figure 11.4 (a), which illustrates the overall labor market. Figure 11.4 (b) illustrates a market for a specific good or service. The original equilibrium (E0) in each market occurs at the intersection of the demand curve (D0) and supply curve (S0). When aggregate demand declines, the demand for labor shifts to the left (to D1) in Figure 11.4 (a), and the demand for goods shifts to the left (to D1) in Figure 11.4 (b). However, because of sticky wages and prices, the wage remains at its original level (W0) for a period of time and the price remains at its original level (P0).
As a result, a situation of excess supply—in which the quantity supplied exceeds the quantity demanded at the existing wage or price—exists in markets for both labor and goods, and Q1 is less than Q0 in both Figure 11.4 (a) and Figure 11.4 (b). When many labor markets and many goods markets all across the economy find themselves in this position, the economy is in a recession; that is, firms cannot sell what they wish to produce at the existing market price and do not wish to hire all who are willing to work at the existing market wage. The Clear It Up feature discusses this problem in more detail.
Clear It Up
Why Is the Pace of Wage Adjustments Slow?
The recovery after the Great Recession in the United States has been slow, with wages stagnant, if not declining. In fact, many low-wage workers at fast-food restaurants and department stores have threatened to strike for higher wages. Their plight is part of a larger trend in job growth and pay in the post recession recovery.
The National Employment Law Project compiled data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and found that, during the Great Recession, 60 percent of job losses were in medium-wage occupations. Most of them were replaced during the recovery period with lowerwage jobs in the service, retail, and food industries. This data is illustrated in Figure 11.5.
Wages in the service, retail, and food industries are at or near minimum wage and tend to be both downwardly and upwardly sticky. Wages are sticky downwardly as a result of minimum wage laws; they may be sticky upwardly if insufficient competition in low-skilled labor markets enables employers to avoid raising wages that would reduce their profits. At the same time, however, the Consumer Price Index increased 11 percent between 2007 and 2012, pushing real wages downward.
The Two Keynesian Assumptions in the AD/AS Model
The Two Keynesian Assumptions in the AD/AS Model
These two Keynesian assumptions—the importance of aggregate demand in causing recession and the stickiness of wages and prices—are illustrated by the AD/AS diagram in Figure 11.6. Note that because of the stickiness of wages and prices, the aggregate supply curve is flatter than either supply curve—labor or specific good. In fact, if wages and prices were so sticky that they did not fall at all, the aggregate supply curve would be completely flat below potential GDP, as shown in Figure 11.6. This outcome is an important example of a macroeconomic externality, when what happens at the macro level is different from and inferior to what happens at the micro level. For example, a firm should respond to a decrease in demand for its product by cutting its price to increase sales. But, if all firms experience a decrease in demand for their products, sticky prices in the aggregate prevent aggregate demand from rebounding, which would be shown as a movement along the AD curve in response to a lower price level.
The original equilibrium of this economy occurs where the aggregate demand function (AD0) intersects with AS. Because this intersection occurs at potential GDP (Yp), the economy is operating at full employment. When aggregate demand shifts to the left, all the adjustment occurs through decreased real GDP or real output. There is no decrease in the price level. Because the equilibrium occurs at Y1, the economy experiences substantial unemployment.
The Expenditure Multiplier
The Expenditure Multiplier
A key concept in Keynesian economics is the expenditure multiplier. The expenditure multiplier is the idea that not only does spending affect the equilibrium level of the GDP, but also that spending is powerful. More precisely, it means that a change in spending causes a more than proportionate change in GDP.
The reason for the expenditure multiplier is that one person’s spending becomes another person’s income, which leads to additional spending and additional income, and so forth, so that the cumulative impact on GDP is greater than the initial increase in spending. Although the multiplier is important for understanding the effectiveness of fiscal policy, it occurs whenever any autonomous increase in spending occurs. Additionally, the multiplier operates in a negative as well as a positive direction. Thus, when investment spending collapsed during the Great Depression, it caused a much larger decrease in real GDP. The size of the multiplier is critical and was a key element in recent discussions of the effectiveness of the Obama administration’s fiscal stimulus package, officially titled the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.
This section may include links to websites that contain links to articles on unrelated topics. See the preface for more information.