# Learning Objectives

### Learning Objectives

By the end of this section, you will be able to do the following:

• Understand the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration
• Study the turning effect of force
• Study the analogy between force and torque, mass and moment of inertia, and linear acceleration and angular acceleration

The information presented in this section supports the following AP® learning objectives and science practices:

• 4.D.1.1 The student is able to describe a representation and use it to analyze a situation in which several forces exerted on a rotating system of rigidly connected objects change the angular velocity and angular momentum of the system. (S.P. 1.2, 1.4)
• 4.D.1.2 The student is able to plan data collection strategies designed to establish that torque, angular velocity, angular acceleration, and angular momentum can be predicted accurately when the variables are treated as being clockwise or counterclockwise with respect to a well-defined axis of rotation, and refine the research question based on the examination of data. (S.P. 3.2, 4.1, 5.1, 5.3)
• 5.E.2.1 The student is able to describe or calculate the angular momentum and rotational inertia of a system in terms of the locations and velocities of objects that make up the system. Students are expected to do qualitative reasoning with compound objects. Students are expected to do calculations with a fixed set of extended objects and point masses. (S.P. 2.2)

If you have ever spun a bike wheel or pushed a merry-go-round, you know that force is needed to change angular velocity as seen in Figure 10.10. In fact, your intuition is reliable in predicting many of the factors that are involved. For example, we know that a door opens slowly if we push too close to its hinges. Furthermore, we know that the more massive the door, the more slowly it opens. The first example implies that the farther the force is applied from the pivot, the greater the angular acceleration; another implication is that angular acceleration is inversely proportional to mass. These relationships should seem very similar to the familiar relationships among force, mass, and acceleration embodied in Newton's second law of motion. There are, in fact, precise rotational analogs to both force and mass.

Figure 10.10 Force is required to spin the bike wheel. The greater the force, the greater the angular acceleration produced. The more massive the wheel, the smaller the angular acceleration. If you push on a spoke closer to the axle, the angular acceleration will be smaller.

To develop the precise relationship among force, mass, radius, and angular acceleration, consider what happens if we exert a force $FF size 12{F} {}$ on a point mass $mm size 12{m} {}$ that is at a distance $rr size 12{r} {}$ from a pivot point, as shown in Figure 10.11. Because the force is perpendicular to $rr size 12{r} {}$, an acceleration $a=Fma=Fm size 12{a= { {F} over {m} } } {}$ is obtained in the direction of $FF size 12{F} {}$. We can rearrange this equation such that $F=maF=ma size 12{F= ital "ma"} {}$ and then look for ways to relate this expression to expressions for rotational quantities. We note that $a=rαa=rα size 12{a=rα} {}$, and we substitute this expression into $F=maF=ma size 12{F= ital "ma"} {}$, yielding

10.40 $F=mrα.F=mrα. size 12{F= ital "mr"α"."} {}$

Recall that torque is the turning effectiveness of a force. In this case, because $FF size 12{"F"} {}$ is perpendicular to $rr size 12{r} {}$, torque is simply $τ=Frτ=Fr size 12{τ=rα} {}$. So, if we multiply both sides of the equation above by $rr size 12{r} {}$, we get torque on the left-hand side. That is,

10.41 $rF=mr2αrF=mr2α size 12{ ital "rF"= ital "mr" rSup { size 8{2} } α} {}$

or

10.42 $τ=mr2α.τ=mr2α. size 12{τ= ital "mr" rSup { size 8{2} } α.} {}$

This last equation is the rotational analog of Newton's second law ($F=maF=ma size 12{F= ital "ma"} {}$), where torque is analogous to force, angular acceleration is analogous to translational acceleration, and $mr2mr2 size 12{ ital "mr" rSup { size 8{2} } } {}$ is analogous to mass or inertia. The quantity $mr2mr2 size 12{ ital "mr" rSup { size 8{2} } } {}$ is called the rotational inertia or moment of inertia of a point mass $mm size 12{m} {}$ a distance $rr size 12{r} {}$ from the center of rotation.

Figure 10.11 An object is supported by a horizontal frictionless table and is attached to a pivot point by a cord that supplies centripetal force. A force $FF size 12{F} {}$ is applied to the object perpendicular to the radius $rr size 12{r} {}$, causing it to accelerate about the pivot point. The force is kept perpendicular to $rr size 12{r} {}$.

### Making Connections: Rotational Motion Dynamics

Dynamics for rotational motion is completely analogous to linear or translational dynamics. Dynamics is concerned with force and mass and their effects on motion. For rotational motion, we will find direct analogs to force and mass that behave just as we would expect from our earlier experiences.

# Rotational Inertia and Moment of Inertia

### Rotational Inertia and Moment of Inertia

Before we can consider the rotation of anything other than a point mass like the one in Figure 10.11, we must extend the idea of rotational inertia to all types of objects. To expand our concept of rotational inertia we define the moment of inertia $II size 12{I} {}$ of an object to be the sum of $mr2mr2 size 12{ ital "mr" rSup { size 8{2} } } {}$ for all the point masses of which it is composed. That is, $I=∑mr2I=∑mr2 size 12{I= Sum {} ital "mr" rSup { size 8{2} } } {}$. Here $II size 12{I} {}$ is analogous to $mm size 12{m} {}$ in translational motion. Because of the distance $rr size 12{r} {}$, the moment of inertia for any object depends on the chosen axis. Actually, calculating $II size 12{I} {}$ is beyond the scope of this text except for one simple case—that of a hoop, which has all its mass at the same distance from its axis. A hoop's moment of inertia around its axis is therefore $MR2MR2 size 12{ ital "MR" rSup { size 8{2} } } {}$, where $MM size 12{M} {}$ is its total mass and $RR size 12{R} {}$ its radius. We use $MM size 12{M} {}$ and $RR size 12{R} {}$ for an entire object to distinguish them from $mm size 12{m} {}$ and $rr size 12{r} {}$ for point masses. In all other cases, we must consult Figure 10.12 (note that the table is piece of artwork that has shapes as well as formulae) for formulas for $II size 12{I} {}$ that have been derived from integration over the continuous body. Note that $II size 12{I} {}$ has units of mass multiplied by distance squared ($kg⋅m2kg⋅m2 size 12{"kg" cdot "m" rSup { size 8{2} } } {}$), as we might expect from its definition.

The general relationship among torque, moment of inertia, and angular acceleration is

10.43 $net τ=Iαnet τ=Iα size 12{τ=Iα} {}$

or

10.44 $α=net τI,α=net τI, size 12{α= { { ital "net"τ} over {I} } ","} {}$

where net $ττ size 12{τ} {}$ is the total torque from all forces relative to a chosen axis. For simplicity, we will only consider torques exerted by forces in the plane of the rotation. Such torques are either positive or negative and add like ordinary numbers. The relationship in is the rotational analog to Newton's second law and is very generally applicable. This equation is actually valid for any torque, applied to any object, relative to any axis.

As we might expect, the larger the torque is, the larger the angular acceleration is. For example, the harder a child pushes on a merry-go-round, the faster it accelerates. Furthermore, the more massive a merry-go-round, the slower it accelerates for the same torque. The basic relationship between moment of inertia and angular acceleration is that the larger the moment of inertia, the smaller is the angular acceleration. But there is an additional twist. The moment of inertia depends not only on the mass of an object, but also on its distribution of mass relative to the axis around which it rotates. For example, it will be much easier to accelerate a merry-go-round full of children if they stand close to its axis than if they all stand at the outer edge. The mass is the same in both cases, but the moment of inertia is much larger when the children are at the edge.

### Take-home Experiment

Cut out a circle that has about a 10 cm radius from stiff cardboard. Near the edge of the circle, write numbers one to 12 like hours on a clock face. Position the circle so that it can rotate freely about a horizontal axis through its center, like a wheel. You could loosely nail the circle to a wall. Hold the circle stationary and with the number 12 positioned at the top, attach a lump of blue putty, sticky material used for fixing posters to walls, at the number three. How large does the lump need to be to just rotate the circle? Describe how you can change the moment of inertia of the circle. How does this change affect the amount of blue putty needed at the number three to just rotate the circle? Change the circle's moment of inertia and then try rotating the circle by using different amounts of blue putty. Repeat this process several times.

In what direction did the circle rotate when you added putty at the number three, clockwise or counterclockwise? In which of these directions was the resulting angular velocity? Was the angular velocity constant? What can we say about the direction clockwise or counterclockwise of the angular acceleration? How could you change the placement of the putty to create angular velocity in the opposite direction?

### Problem-Solving Strategy for Rotational Dynamics

1. Examine the situation to determine that torque and mass are involved in the rotation. Draw a careful sketch of the situation.
2. Determine the system of interest.
3. Draw a free body diagram. That is, draw and label all external forces acting on the system of interest.
4. Apply , the rotational equivalent of Newton's second law, to solve the problem. Care must be taken to use the correct moment of inertia and to consider the torque about the point of rotation.
5. As always, check the solution to see if it is reasonable.

### Making Connections

In statics, the net torque is zero, and there is no angular acceleration. In rotational motion, net torque is the cause of angular acceleration, exactly as in Newton's second law of motion for rotation.

Figure 10.12 Some rotational inertias.

### Example 10.7Calculating the Effect of Mass Distribution on a Merry-Go-Round

Consider the father pushing a playground merry-go-round in Figure 10.13. He exerts a force of 250 N at the edge of the 50-kg merry-go-round, which has a 1.50 m radius. Calculate the angular acceleration produced (a) when no one is on the merry-go-round and (b) when an 18-kg child sits 1.25 m away from the center. Consider the merry-go-round itself to be a uniform disk with negligible retarding friction.

Figure 10.13 A father pushes a playground merry-go-round at its edge and perpendicular to its radius to achieve maximum torque.

Strategy

Angular acceleration is given directly by the expression $α=net τIα=net τI size 12{τ=Iα,α= { { ital "net"τ} over {I} } } {}$ .

10.45 $α=τIα=τI size 12{α= { {τ} over {I} } } {}$

To solve for $αα size 12{α} {}$, we must first calculate the torque $ττ size 12{τ} {}$ which is the same in both cases and moment of inertia $II size 12{I} {}$ which is greater in the second case. To find the torque, we note that the applied force is perpendicular to the radius and friction is negligible, so that

10.46 $τ=rFsin θ=(1.50 m)(250 N)=375 N⋅m.τ=rFsin θ=(1.50 m)(250 N)=375 N⋅m. size 12{τ="rFsinθ"= $$1 "." "50m"$$ $$"250N"$$ ="375N" "." "m."} {}$

Solution for (a)

The moment of inertia of a solid disk about this axis is given in Figure 10.12 to be

10.47 $12MR2,12MR2, size 12{ { {1} over {2} } ital "MR" rSup { size 8{2} } ","} {}$

where $M=50 kgM=50 kg size 12{M="50" "." 0 ital "kg"} {}$ and $R=1.50 mR=1.50 m size 12{R=1 "." "50"m} {}$, so that

10.48 $I=(0.500)(50 kg)(1.50 m)2=56.25 kg⋅m2.I=(0.500)(50 kg)(1.50 m)2=56.25 kg⋅m2. size 12{I=0 "." 5 $$"50" "." "0kg"$$ $$1 "." "50m"$$ rSup { size 8{2} } ="56" "." "25kg" "." "m" rSup { size 8{2} } "."} {}$

Now, after we substitute the known values, we find the angular acceleration to be

10.49 $α=τI=375 N⋅m56.25 kg⋅m2=6.67rads2.α=τI=375 N⋅m56.25 kg⋅m2=6.67rads2. size 12{α= { {τ} over {I} } = { {"375""N" "." "m"} over {"56" "." "25""kg" "." "m" rSup { size 8{2} } } } =6 "." "67" { {"rad"} over {s rSup { size 8{2} } } } "."} {}$

Solution for (b)

We expect the angular acceleration for the system to be less in this part, because the moment of inertia is greater when the child is on the merry-go-round. To find the total moment of inertia $II size 12{I} {}$, we first find the child's moment of inertia $IcIc size 12{I rSub { size 8{c} } } {}$ by considering the child to be equivalent to a point mass at a distance of 1.25 m from the axis. Then,

10.50 $Ic=MR2=(18 kg)(1.25 m)2=28.13 kg⋅m2.Ic=MR2=(18 kg)(1.25 m)2=28.13 kg⋅m2. size 12{I rSub { size 8{c} } ="MR" rSup { size 8{2} } = $$"18" "." 0"kg"$$ $$1 "." "25"m$$ rSup { size 8{2} } ="28" "." "13""kg" "." m rSup { size 8{2} } "."} {}$

The total moment of inertia is the sum of moments of inertia of the merry-go-round and the child about the same axis. To justify this sum to yourself, examine the definition of $II size 12{I} {}$.

10.51 $I=28.13 kg⋅m2+56.25 kg⋅m2=84.38 kg⋅m2I=28.13 kg⋅m2+56.25 kg⋅m2=84.38 kg⋅m2 size 12{I="28" "." "13""kg" "." m rSup { size 8{2} } +"56" "." "25""kg" "." m rSup { size 8{2} } ="84" "." "38""kg" "." m rSup { size 8{2} } } {}$

Substituting known values into the equation for $αα size 12{α} {}$ gives

10.52 $α=τI=375 N⋅m84.38 kg⋅m2=4.44rads2.α=τI=375 N⋅m84.38 kg⋅m2=4.44rads2. size 12{α= { {τ} over {I} } = { {"375N" "." m} over {"84" "." "38kg" "." m rSup { size 8{2} } } } =4 "." "44" { {"rad"} over {s rSup { size 8{2} } } } "."} {}$

Discussion

The angular acceleration is less when the child is on the merry-go-round than when the merry-go-round is empty, as expected. The angular accelerations found are quite large, partly due to the fact that friction was considered to be negligible. If, for example, the father kept pushing perpendicularly for 2 s, he would give the merry-go-round an angular velocity of 13.3 rad/s when it is empty but only 8.89 rad/s when the child is on it. In terms of revolutions per second, these angular velocities are 2.12 rev/s and 1.41 rev/s, respectively. The father would end up running at about 50 km/h in the first case. Summer Olympics, here he comes! Confirmation of these numbers is left as an exercise for the reader.

### Making Connections: Multiple Forces on One System

A large potter's wheel has a diameter of 60 cm and a mass of 8 kg. It is powered by a 20 N motor acting on the outer edge. There is also a brake capable of exerting a 15 N force at a radius of 12 cm from the axis of rotation, on the underside.

What is the angular acceleration when the motor is in use?

The torque is found by $τ = rF sin θ = (0.300 m)(20 N) = 6 N·mτ = rF sin θ = (0.300 m)(20 N) = 6 N·m$.

The moment of inertia is calculated as $I = 12 MR2 = 12(8 kg)(0.300 m)2 = 0.36 kg⋅m2I = 12 MR2 = 12(8 kg)(0.300 m)2 = 0.36 kg⋅m2$.

Thus, the angular acceleration would be $α = τI = 6 N⋅m0.36 kg⋅m2 = 17 rad/s2α = τI = 6 N⋅m0.36 kg⋅m2 = 17 rad/s2$.

Note that the friction is always acting in a direction opposite to the rotation that is currently happening in this system. If the potter makes a mistake and has both the brake and motor on simultaneously, the friction force of the brake will exert a torque opposite that of the motor.

The torque from the brake is $τ = rF sin θ = (0.120 m)(15 N) = 1.80 N⋅mτ = rF sin θ = (0.120 m)(15 N) = 1.80 N⋅m$.

Thus, the net torque is .

And the angular acceleration is $α = τI = 4.20 N⋅m0.36 kg⋅m2 = 12 rad/s2α = τI = 4.20 N⋅m0.36 kg⋅m2 = 12 rad/s2$.